🌙
☀️
IIIT Lucknow · MSD24006

Data-Driven · MCDM Framework · 2021–2026

World University
Rankings

A transparent, multi-criteria framework using Entropy, AHP & TOPSIS to rank global universities across six years of Times Higher Education data.

Universities
Countries
6 Years
Avg Spearman r
Teaching Research Environment Research Quality Industry Impact International Outlook

Model Accuracy by Year

Spearman Correlation

Methodology

01
Data Collection

THE scraping 2021–2026 · BeautifulSoup

University performance data was scraped from the Times Higher Education World University Rankings website for 6 consecutive years (2021–2026) using Python & BeautifulSoup. The dataset covers ~2,450 universities across 100+ countries with five core criteria scores per record.
02
Weight Calculation

Entropy (objective) + AHP (subjective)

Criteria weights are computed by combining two complementary methods: Shannon Entropy derives objective weights from the inherent variability of each score, while Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) captures expert-defined subjective priorities. The combined weight balances both perspectives for a robust MCDM model.
03
TOPSIS Ranking

Closeness to ideal best solution

Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) computes a closeness coefficient for each university — measuring how close its profile is to the ideal best and how far from the ideal worst. This score (0–1) is used to produce the final MCDM ranking.
04
Validation

Spearman · Kendall Tau · Sensitivity

Model accuracy is validated by comparing MCDM rankings to official THE rankings using Spearman's rank correlation (ρ) and Kendall's Tau (τ). Sensitivity analysis tests how rankings shift when individual criteria weights are perturbed, confirming model robustness across all 6 years.
🎓

About the Project

This capstone research project at IIIT Lucknow builds a fully transparent, data-driven alternative to proprietary university ranking systems. By combining Entropy weighting, AHP, and TOPSIS, it produces reproducible, auditable rankings that expose how each criterion contributes to a university's final position.

  • 🔬 Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework
  • 📊 6 years of longitudinal data (2021–2026)
  • 🌐 2,450+ universities across 100+ countries
  • ✅ Validated against official THE rankings
💡

Key Findings

The MCDM model achieves an average Spearman correlation above 0.95 with THE official rankings, confirming its accuracy. Several important insights emerged from the 6-year analysis:

  • 📈 Research Quality has the highest entropy weight (most discriminating)
  • 🏭 Industry Impact is the fastest-growing criterion since 2021
  • 🔄 Top-10 universities remain stable; positions 50–200 show highest mobility
  • 🌍 Asia-Pacific universities show the strongest upward trend across years
📁

Data & Tools

All data and code are reproducible. The pipeline is built entirely in Python using open-source libraries:

  • 📄 Source: Times Higher Education (THE) Rankings 2021–2026
  • 🐍 Scraping: Python · requests · BeautifulSoup
  • 🔢 Analysis: pandas · NumPy · SciPy
  • 📊 Visualisation: Plotly · Flask · Vanilla JS
  • ✔️ Validation: scipy.stats (spearmanr, kendalltau)

Year-wise MCDM

University Rankings

Full Rankings Table

RankTHEUniversityCountry ScoreTeachingRes. Env Res. QualIndustryIntl.

Dynamic Comparison

Rank Trends 2021–2026

Rank Over Time

Lower = Better Position

Closeness Score Over Time

Deep Dive

University Profile

2021 → 2026

Biggest Movers

▲ Top Risers

Most improved 2021→2026

▼ Top Fallers

Biggest drops 2021→2026

All Movers

UniversityCountryRank 2021Rank 2026Change

Model Accuracy

Validation Results

Spearman Rank Correlation — All Years

Agreement with Official THE Ranking

Validation Table

YearSpearman rp-valuenStrength

What-if Analysis

Predict My Rank

Enter Your Scores

Scale 0 – 100
Teaching 50
Research Environment 50
Research Quality 50
Industry Impact 50
International Outlook 50

Adjust scores and click
Calculate My Rank